Outcomes From Treatment of Infertility With Natural Procreative Technology in an Irish General Practice
Objectives: We evaluated outcomes in couples treated for infertility with natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology [corrected] NPT), a systematic medical approach for optimizing physiologic conditions for conception in vivo, from an Irish general practice.
Methods: All couples receiving treatment from 2 NPT-trained family physicians between February 1998 and January 2002 were studied. The main outcome was live birth, and secondary outcomes included conceptions and multiple births. Crude proportions and adjusted life-table proportions were calculated per 100 couples.
Results: A total of 1239 couples had an initial consult for NPT, of which 1072 had been trying for at least a year to conceive and initiated treatment. The average female age was 35.8 years, the mean duration of attempting to conceive was 5.6 years, 24% had a prior birth, and 33% had previously attempted treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART). All couples were taught to identify the fertile days of the menstrual cycle with the Creighton Model FertilityCare System, and most received additional medical treatment, including clomiphene (75%). In life-table analysis, the cumulative proportion of first live births for those completing up to 24 months of NPT treatment was 52.8 per 100 couples. The crude proportion was 25.5. Younger couples and couples without previous ART attempts had higher rates of live birth. Among live births, there were 4.6% twin births.
Conclusion: NPT provided by trained general practitioners had live birth rates comparable to cohort studies of more invasive treatments, including ART. Further studies are warranted to compare NPT directly to other treatments.
Abstract Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18772291
Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice.
Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Boyle PC.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):375-84. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070239. Erratum in: J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6):583.